Big Trouble’s limited success is because of the extreme amount
of sensitivity to the terrorist attacks. The plot is ultimately about a man
trying to get a bomb off of a plane and even worse, it’s a comedy. What once
was a comedic extravaganza is now a panned piece of trash. I’m not taking
9/11 into consideration when grading the film, and am only giving it a
marginal recommendation, which enables me to say that it was a lost cause in
the first place. There are quite a few funny parts throughout the flicks
duration, but the entire picture gives us less than enough; though it still
makes a worthwhile sit.
The plot has a million different things going on,
but in a nutshell, it is about Arthur Herk, a rich man, trying to buy a
bomb. The story first starts with a homeless man named Puggy, eating a bag
of Fritos, whom we first assume is some kind of Jesus on crack. We find out
that he is simply the narrator of Big Trouble, as well as a
supporting character. A conflict creates when he decides to move to
Miami,
when looking at an ad in Martha Stuart Living Magazine, inside of his home;
a cardboard box in an alley. He busts a cheap ride down to
Florida
on a fishing boat from
Maryland,
and soon he makes it there. He walks into a vacant bar with about five
bucks, and pays the bartender three of them for a drink. Some hardcore men
walk into the bar and up to him, and then steal his change. He soon stumbles
upon Tim Allen’s character and finds a woman, which I won’t get into because
it will be spoiling too many laughs.
The screenplay, by Robert Ramsey, is based on the
novel by Dave Barry. Both of these men have stylishly written a very comedic
story, and should be complimented; the writing is definitely not one of the
flicks errors. The use of several different stories is not only intelligent,
but unique; I haven’t seen multiple plots in one film since The
Silence of the Lambs. The unique Puggy was beautifully done, and is one
of the most inventive characters ever created in the movie business. Irony,
for lack of a better word, is Big Trouble’s best trait, it
similar to the Farelly Brother’s Shallow Hal (2001); much of
its material can be taken very seriously, but almost everything turns out to
be funny. This film will get less laughs that Shallow Hal
because of the sensitivity shown to the terrorist attacks, but is still
pretty goddam hilarious any.
The direction, by Barry Sonnenfeld, is similar to
his work on Men in Black II; it isn’t good, it isn’t bad, but
it is adequate. The camera angles are done in a very mainstream way, and the
special effects look cheesy; but they all have their own way of fitting in,
and that’s the great thing about Sonnenfeld. He is not used to dealing with
low budgets; both of the “Men in Black’s” were made for over 75 million
dollars. But in Big Trouble, he had to sacrifice some of the
stunning effects, and work with the solid screenplay. There is no way in
hell to say that his work on the film was “inspirational”, but it fit the
material, and produced a passing result.
Big Trouble is nothing beautiful, but
it provides us with some short-lived laughs and a good time at the movies.
The final result is just above average, but is a heck of a lot better than
some of the crappy material put into theatres these days. If you can’t make
the matinee or early bird showings of the film, I would wait until it comes
to video or Pay-Per-View. The Final Verdict: See it once, and enjoy it, but
it does not deserve a tremendous amount of respect because of its average
direction and poor looking scenes.
-Danny, Bucket Reviews