On
the surface, Interview is another one of
those art-pictures that raises that
infamous critical question: must a viewer sympathize
with at least one character in a movie to be able to
enjoy it? Typically, my answer to this question would
be a definite “yes,” but this film represents an
exception to the norm. In fact, the two main
characters in Interview are so far removed from
the realities of the Manhattan surrounding them—their
actions and thoughts are so internalized that find
themselves merely floating in a whirlwind of
condemnable moral dilemmas—that it would be fruitless
of the viewer to expect to find any redeeming or
empathetic qualities in either of them. Interview
doesn’t work because it allows the viewer to
understand these characters, but rather because it
indulges said viewer’s fascination for the plane on
which said characters exist.
The leading duo is played by
Steve Buscemi and Sienna Miller. He’s self-promoting
and thick-headed journalist Pierre Peders and she’s
Katya, the air-headed “actress” who he has been
assigned to interview over dinner. The interview is
uncomfortable for the both of them from the moment
that they begin to talk: Pierre feels that the task of
interviewing a popular celebrity is beneath an
important political muckraker such as himself and
Katya is offended that he would display such a lack of
interest in his subject. One thing leads to another,
and the two end up in Katya’s New York City loft,
engaging in a slimy-but-addictive war of words while
swigging down alcohol by the quart. As the night
progresses and each becomes further enraptured in the
morbid and uncanny chokehold they have over the other,
revelations begin to surface about both Pierre and
Katya through the method of their own confession.
Interview may contain
one too many twists regarding Pierre and Katya’s pasts,
but is nonetheless an unflinching portrait of two
individuals who have found nothing but filth through
interaction in their respective social circles. It’s
engrossing to watch each character attempt to feel
better about their self by taunting the other. Buscemi
and Miller are both revelatory in these roles, getting
their hands dirty as they embody the two corrupted
individuals. What’s more: despite its generally yucky
antics, Interview never ceases to function as an
accurate narrative-manipulation of identifiable
personalities. In other words, even if Pierre and Katya
may not be entirely realistic characters in and of
themselves, they inhabit character-traits representative
of their respective “type” of person, thereby evoking a
stimulating study of each’s function in society.
I am informed that
Interview is a remake of a 2003 film by Theo van
Gogh, the Dutch filmmaker who was recently slain by a
Muslim extremist. This fact seems somewhat strange,
given how distinctly American this picture feels.
Miller’s Katya comes off as a more-intellectual hybrid
of Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton, and Buscemi’s Pierre
is a spot-on representation of just about every other
mainstream American journalist currently working. Even
when Interview tosses somewhat implausible
character-epiphanies into its plot, it always feels to
be naturally progressing due to the naively
sophisticated nature of its pop-culture-driven Americana
setting.
Interview may not be an
enjoyable motion picture by default, but I found reward
in the process of being engrossed in the
socially-removed interaction between its focal
characters. A viewer looking for immediate satisfaction
in a film’s content should not come near this movie; its
most-riveting qualities are only digestible after the
work is considered as a thematic-whole. In many senses,
Interview is what Mike Nichols’ 2004 feature,
Closer, would’ve been had Nichols not tried to
suggest his characters were normal, everyday people.
Pierre and Katya are nasty and perhaps hollow
individuals, but they provoke a strong audience reaction
as Interview progresses and ends. The film is—all
at once—pungent, malaise, and relentless. Those who see
it may not like what they witness, but they won’t soon
forget it, either.
-Danny
Baldwin, Bucket Reviews (8.5.2007)